Analytical Examination Essay

This paper testament give out some the RA 10354 to a fault called obligated P benthood and procreative health profess of 2012. This essay will gratuity a short history of the rectitude hither in the Philippines until it become enacted and employ. This will talk well-nigh the major aliment of the natural law in concert with its important contents ranging from health veneration to contraception. This will overly discuss the issues that atomic number 18 connected to this law while it was a commit notice such(prenominal) as mother want death, early maternity, premarital sex, poverty and universe of discourse and fruitful health cultivation.Issues concern with legislation of the peckerwood such as the indispensableness and morality of the touchstone and its contents like contraception and procreative health instruction will be particularly presented. some other sweets which may render affect the promote for the bill will be to a fault presented and analyz ed. This will excessively present the major groups that approve or even out the utter law to becomeher with their reasons why they want or are once against the state law. This will also talk about the actions those groups have taken for or against the law which may have affected the support for the bills implementation.This is also pertain with the voices of certain world organizations such as UNESCO and WHO on reproductive health fostering and the stand of the church service on the egress about contraception, self-continence and marri time. This will be concerned about their statement about the consider and the doctrines and surveys they adhere with. Summary Since its basic prompting on 1988, the procreative health tone experienced m each debates if it was genuinely needed here in the Philippines.The proposition was changed and make betterd by a look of proponents many times scarcely was by and large neglected. Then, a similar bill was also introduced in the firs t regular seance of the 14th Congress by Albay Rep. Edcel C. Lagman, Jannette L. Garin, Narciso D. capital of Chile tether, Mark Llandro Mendoza, Ana Theresia Hontiveros-Baraquel and Elandro Jesus F. Madrona that was cognize as Ho aim Bill 5043. bid that of the former bills, it was also disposed barely its proponents never stop to improve, change and draw back some parts of the former bill to create a new one. many an(prenominal) times Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman and its principal authors would edit the bill until the generative Bill of 2012 was formed. Senator Pia Cayetano was also a principal sponsor of such bill. Upon declilanded estate 19, 2012, the Senate enacted the bill and on celestial latitude 21, 2012, four days to begin with Christmas His Presidency, Benigno Aquino III signed the bill and was to be implemented fifteen days after its formal publication. The law was known as RA 10354 or Responsible Parenthood and reproductive Health identification number of 2012.Its major provisions are to promote and have entree to reproductive health accusation and methods that are legal and safe, to promote family planning methods and trusty parenthood, to counsel women who committed abortion in a humane way, to mandate reproductive health gentility in age admitness to students, to supply and maintain reproductive health services to all, to protect reproductive health rights and to penalize those who restricts or prohibits the penetration to reproductive health divvy up and methods say in this law. The law mandates the hire of dexterous health professionals for maternalistic health care and birth attendance, seen in Sec.5. It also promotes the advertise of health care facilities for obstetric and young care as verbalize in Sec. 6 and to access for family planning methods especially to the poor and marginalized couple and to sexually expeditious minors as said in Sec. 7. The law also states that hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices, in jectables and other safe, legal, non-abortifacient and effective family planning products and supplies(RA 10354, Sec. 9) should be treated in the Essential Drugs listing after subjection to reputable medical exam associations.It also mandates the procurement and distri scarceions of family-planning supplies and age appropriate reproductive health nurture, stated in Sec. 10 and 14 respectively. And lastly, to condemn any who shall prohibit the access to health care and family-planning supplies. Since its first introduction by Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman, this law had reaped many opposition and approval before being enacted. The pro- char groups fought for saving the lives of woman from maternal death on the other hand the church service and other pro- spiritedness groups fought for lordliness of the unborn and the sanctity of marriage.The senate itself was divided for selecting to if they will oppose or approve the bill. The source President and Pampanga Rep. Gloria Macapagal-Arroy o was known to opposed the bill and be backed upon by the church meanwhile President Benigno Aquino III shown arrangement towards the bill and expected its implementation. The pronouncement of pontiff Emeritus Benedict XVI to condoms also became news if the Church was open to contraception. This gave new hope for Edcel Lagman from acceptance of the Church but Paranaque Rep.Roilo Golez explained that the Pope talks about health, that preventing human immunodeficiency virus from spreading is showing compassion but the Pope doesnt said to use condoms to prevent pregnancy. Issues also attract the said bill. First, is about the legislation of the bill, if it was really pertinent here in the country with regards to overpopulation, approachability/Provisions for RH information and healthcare for mothers and baberen. Another issue is if the RH Bill is moral, if the Church must interfere with the carry and if the government is willing to give finances to the bill.Third, is about the consequence of a far-flung of contraceptives with regards to health and sexual behavior. The last is concerned in the need of sex education in the country. The CBCP together with the national Church felt that it was time to educate again its faithful and do efforts on counteracting the bill. The Church turned offering masses, praying for the enlightenment of congressmen and women and explained that principles of the bill undermine the sanctity of life and marriage. They stated that overpopulation was not the problem but corruptness and the unequal distribution of people.They seek to get online, and used CBCP for Life for addressing the matter and let the Simbang Gabi 2012 be used for educating the faithful. They also made catechisms with themes regarding the RH. Meanwhile, pro-woman and pro-RH group also organize plans for the bill. They have tied violet ribbons on their strengthen signifying their fight against human immunodeficiency virus-AIDS. Informed people about sex activi ty inequality, maternal deaths, teenage pregnancy and HIV-AIDS and that the bill would help minimize or eliminate such problems.UNESCO and WHO also promotes the education of youths regarding reproductive health. They state that benefits such as a delay in sexual initiation reduction of unwanted pregnancies, child abuse and abortion and a lazy spread of HIV could be obtained. It stack also induce progress to gender equity, social participation and partnership. It prepares the youths for responsibility as adults, emphasizes health promotion and flush toilet improve relevance in education systems. Meanwhile, the Catholic Church holds its deposit of faith center on on Divine Love and genius in Marriage.Its Catechism says that Marriage is by which a man and a woman progress intimate communion for life which is tenacious for the good of the spouse and the procreation and education of children,(1660, Catechism of the Catholic Church). It also states that the total interchangeable s elf-giving is overlaid through and through contraception for it is a refusal for the total giving of self through taking off openness to life,( 2370,Catechism of the Catholic Church). It states that even communication with a authorized wife but taking away the power to generate life is different to Gods will and leaves depravity of a grave sin,(55-56, Casti Connubii).The Church also teaches the virtue of chastity, that the couple must play conjugal love and fidelity and that of safeguarding life form the moment of conception, (51, Gaudium et Spes). She teaches that Marriage can never justify sexual intercourse which is contraceptive which oppose to its true sum and that artificial methods could lead to marital infidelity and lowering moral standards, reduction of woman as mere object of delight and intervening of public authorities to the close personal and intimate responsibilities of couples, (14,17 Humanae Vitae).It also addresses the value of self-discipline to repel i nordinate self-interests and to admit the passions of the body,(21, Humanae Vitae). References Software Ecumenical Council of Vatican II. Catechism of the Catholic Church. Retrieved from CATECH01. exe Websites and Webpages Anonymous. (2012, December 21). Republic Act 10354. Retrieved from http//pcw. gov. ph/sites/ fail/files/documents/laws/republic_act_10354. pdf Burgonio, T. (2010, November 21). Popes pronouncement on condoms strengthens RH Bill Lagman. Retrieved from http//newsinfo. inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20101121-304495/Popes-pronouncement-on-condoms-strengthens-RH-billLagman Dionisio, E. R. (2012, August 8). A consume to Arguments for and against the Reproductive Health Bill. Retrieved from http//www. adnu. edu. ph/images/A%20Guide%20to%20Arguments %20For%20and%20Against%20the%20Reproductive%20Health%20Bill. pdf Ecumenical Council of Vatican II. Gaudium et Spes. Retrieved from http//www. vatican. va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_cons _19651207_gaudium-et-spes_en. html capital of Minnesota VI. Humanae Vitae.Retrieved from http//www. vatican. va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae_en. html Pius XI. Casti Connubii. Retrieved from http//www. vatican. va/holy_father/pius_xi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_31121930_casti-connubii_en. html Sun. star. Church RH Bill. Retrieved from http//www. sunstar. com. ph/davao/weekend/church-rh-bill Saclag, D. E. D. Group asks SC to lift suspension of RH Law. Retrieved from http//www. bworldonline. com/content. php? separate=Nation&title=Group-asks-SC-to-lift-suspension-of-RH-Law&id=71130 Unknown.(2012, August 14). Reproductive Health Bill, Good or Bad. Retrieved from http//behealthconsciousblog. wordpress. com/2012/08/14/reproductive-health-bill-good-or-bad/ Unknown. (2012, December 29). Republic Act 10354, Reproductive Health Act of 2012. Retrieved from http//filipinoscribe. com/2012/12/29/republic-act-10354-reproductive-health-act-of-2 012/ Unknown. House Bill no. 5043, Reproductive Health and Population Development Act of 2008. Retrieved from http//jlp-law. com/blog/full-text-of-house-bill-no-5043-reproductive-health-and-population-development-act-of-2008/Villegas, B. M. et al. (2012, September 12) Handbook of Truths on RH Bill. Retrieved from http//cbcpforlife. com/? p=8859 Villegas, S. B. (2012, December 15). contraception is Corruption, A Pastoral Letter on the Latest decision on the Rh Bill. Retrieved from http//cbcponline. net/v2/? p=6241 World Health Organization. Family Life, Reproductive Health and Population procreation Key Elements of a Health-Promoting School. Retrieved from http//hivaidsclearinghouse. unesco. org/search/resources/HIV%20AIDS%20231. pdf